The API value of a <textarea> element is its raw value with normalized
newlines. This should be used in a couple of places where we currently
use the raw value.
These tests seem to interact in a way that times out the test runner and
messes up its expectations. The 'current test' moves on just as the
previous crypto test calls done, resulting in the wrong expectations
being checked. In reality these tests should be timing out themselves,
rather than causing adjacent tests to fail intermittently...
I think the context normally changes for every bit. But this here
is enough to correctly decode the test bitstream in Annex H.2 in
the spec, which seems like a good checkpoint.
The internals of the decoder use spec naming, to make the code
look virtually identical to what's in the spec. (Even so, I managed
to put in several typos that took a while to track down.)
The behavior of Crypto::UnsignedBigInt::export_data unexpectedly
does not actually remove leading zero bytes when the corresponding
parameter is passed. The caller must manually adjust for the location
of the zero bytes.
We were unconditionally creating new File objects for all Blob-type
values passed to `FormData.append`. We should only do so if the value is
not already a File object (or if the `filename` attribute is present).
We must also carry MIME type information forward from the underlying
Blob object.
This patch implements and tests window.crypto.sublte.generateKey with
an RSA-OAEP algorithm. In order for the types to be happy, the
KeyAlgorithms objects are moved to their own .h/.cpp pair, and the new
KeyAlgorithms for RSA are added there.
When inserting a node into a parent, any live DOM ranges that reference
the parent may need to be updated. The spec does this by increasing or
decreasing the start/end offsets of each live range *before* actually
performing the insertion.
This caused us to crash with a verification failure, since it was
possible to set the range offset to an invalid value (that would go on
to immediately become valid after the insertion was finished).
This patch fixes the issue by adding special badged helpers on Range for
Node to reach into it and increase/decrease the offsets during node
insertion. This skips the offset validity check and actually makes our
code read slightly more like the spec.
Found by Domato :^)
Rather than try to lay out masks normally, this updates the TreeBuilder
to create layout nodes for masks as a child of their user (i.e. the
masked element). This allows each use of a mask to be laid out
differently, which makes supporting `maskContentUnits=objectBoundingBox`
fairly easy.
The `SVGFormattingContext` is then updated to lay out masks last (as
their sizing may depend on their parent), and treats them like
viewports.
This is pretty ad-hoc, but the SVG specification does not give any
guidance on how to actually implement this.
The loop that was supposed to check the chain of previous or next
siblings had a logic mistake where it would never traverse the chain,
so we would get stuck looking at the immediate sibling forever.
After removing an iframe from the DOM, its contentWindow will be
detached from its browsing context, per spec.
Because the contentWindow is still accessible, we cannot assume that
Window objects always have an associated browsing context.
This needs to be fixed in the spec, but let's add a sensible null check
in the meantime.
Since SVG gradients can reference each other, we have to keep track of
visited gradients when traversing the link chain, or we will recurse
infinitely when there's a reference cycle.
Instead of creating a generic Layout::Box, make a BlockContainer. This
allows them to be laid out by BFC, which is better than nothing(?),
even if it's not going to be correct at all.
Normally, assigning to e.g document.body.onload will forward to
window.onload. However, in a detached DOM tree, there is no associated
window, so we have nowhere to forward to, making this a no-op.
The bulk of this change is making Document::window() return a nullable
pointer, as documents created by DOMParser or DOMImplementation do not
have an associated window object, and so must be able to return null
from here.
That's not actually a DOM invariant, just something the HTML parser
refuses to build. You can still construct table-less th and td elements
using the DOM API.
Otherwise, we percent-encode negative signed chars incorrectly. For
example, https://www.strava.com/login contains the following hidden
<input> field:
<input name="utf8" type="hidden" value="✓" />
On submitting the form, we would percent-encode that field as:
utf8=%-1E%-64%-6D
Which would cause us to receive an HTTP 500 response. We now properly
percent-encode that field as:
utf8=%E2%9C%93
And can login to Strava :^)
With this, `image` can convert any jbig2 file, as long as it's
black (or white), and LibPDF can draw jbig2 files (again, as long
as they only contain a single color stored in just a
PageInformation segment).
I extracted a pure-white jbig2 that has only a PageInformation segment
from a PDF and manually edited the bytes to reduce the bitmap size to
47x23 and to clear all unneded bits (except, in the black version,
the page color bit is set).
If the provided ID is smaller than the corner clipping vector, we would
shrink the vector to match. This causes a crash when we have nested
PaintContext instances (as these IDs are allocated by PaintContext),
each of which perform radius painting.
This is seen on https://www.strava.com/login when it loads a reCAPTCHA.
The outer div has a border radius, which contains the reCAPTCHA in an
iframe. That iframe contains an SVG which also has a border radius.
Now, if an element belongs to a shadow tree, we use only the style
sheets from the corresponding shadow root during style computation,
instead of using all available style sheets as was the case
previously.
The only exception is the user agent style sheets, which are still
taken into account for all elements.
Tests/LibWeb/Layout/input/input-element-with-display-inline.html
is affected because style of document no longer affects shadow tree
of input element, like it is supposed to be.
Co-authored-by: Simon Wanner <simon+git@skyrising.xyz>
If a style element belongs to a shadow tree, its CSSStyleSheet is now
added to the corresponding ShadowRoot instead of the document.
Co-authored-by: Simon Wanner <simon+git@skyrising.xyz>
